You send us 12 months of electricity and gas invoices and a photo of the main switchboard. Within 5 business days we come back with a realistic technical forecast, including the part you would rather not hear if that is the case. No card, no commitment.
The preferred route. Press the button and a draft opens with the fields we need already laid out — you only have to fill them in.
oscar.brihuega
@quantumzigma.com
Technical response within 5 business days
If you would rather start with a short conversation before sending documentation, this is the fastest route.
(+34) 648 25 17 07
Business hours, mainland Spain time
If the conversation is going to involve systems — and it should — we open it directly with them before anything is signed.
Technical review
up front
Before a single data point leaves your plant
The initial assessment contains not a single company-introduction slide. It is a reading of your data and a conclusion.
Breakdown by tariff period, contracted versus demanded power, reactive energy and the structure of the energy term.
What genuinely drives your consumption, and which of those variables you are not measuring today at the resolution required.
Which of the six families fit your installation, with the expected order of magnitude and what data would confirm them.
Indicative estimate of claimable Spanish Energy Savings Certificates and a PERTE Decarbonisation fit assessment.
Proceed or don't. If the answer is no, it comes with the technical reason and without a counter-offer.
We state explicitly what falls outside the reach of a desk analysis and can only be resolved by measuring.
Technical founders and a team of more than fourteen developers and engineers. Technology developed in house: the energy engineering, the modelling and the analytics are ours, not subcontracted.
Spanish company registered in Lleida. This is the entity that contracts with clients in the European Union.
Incorporated in Florida in July 2025. Custodian of intellectual property and the vehicle for international expansion.
No model output reaches a client without engineering review. Automation proposes, a person validates.
Whoever runs the optimisation is not whoever validates the savings. That is what avoids the judge-and-party conflict in the M&V report.